RigorMed

Life sciences

Connect experimental literature and controls with replicate checks, exploratory analysis, mechanistic arguments and research communication.

Start with a focused task

Literature and mechanistic evidence

Keep search queries, source locations and disagreements; state which full texts were actually read.

Experimental design and controls

State the question, assumptions, design and comparison conditions; flag choices needing researcher review.

Experimental data and replicate checks

Check variables, units, missing values, duplicates and provenance; record changes without silent imputation or deletion.

Quantitative results and exploratory analysis

Check material and method suitability first; execute required calculations and deliver code, results and limitations.

Mechanistic claims and alternative explanations

Use independent checks, alternative explanations or applicable sensitivity checks; report failure conditions and unresolved issues.

Experimental figures and results

Create figures and tables from checked results with units, captions and sources; retain reusable code.

Methods, results and manuscript writing

Draft from actual materials and results, check numbers and citations, and identify drafts and unknowns.

Lab meetings, peer review and defense

Deliver issue lists, point-by-point responses or presentation material; distinguish corrections, missing evidence and unresolved issues.

Current scope

Check interpretations against the source. This does not validate mechanisms, provide general omics analysis, or certify laboratory safety.

Research examples

Browse research outputs and find a starting point for your task.

View all